Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices
Title : Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices
Link : Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices
- Boris Johnson announced he is hoping for life in the UK to return to something close to normal by Christmas
- He told a Downing Street press conference he wants more workers to start heading back to offices in August
- Changing work from home rules comes after Sir Patrick Vallance warned there is 'no reason' to change policy
- Prime Minister also announced that stadiums could reopen to audiences for football and gigs from October
- However, he warned UK must be ready for second wave as he handed councils and ministers new powers
- 'Lightning lockdown' powers will allow for public spaces to be shut and for stay at home orders to be imposedBoris Johnson's hopes of getting life back to normal by Christmas have been attacked as over optimistic as unions accused the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' to businesses over when workers should return to offices.
Mr Johnson today announced a timetable for the further easing of lockdown in England as he said restrictions on using public transport were being lifted from today while workers will be encouraged to resume their normal commutes in August.He said football stadiums could reopen to crowds in October, leisure facilities like ice rinks and bowling alleys can welcome back customers from next month and that he is aiming to 'allow a more significant return to normality from November at the earliest'.However, the announcements prompted an immediate wave of criticism as Mr Johnson's political opponents ridiculed the suggestion that life could be back to normal by the end of the year while unions accused the PM of failing to take responsibility for getting the nation back to work.Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford said you would 'have to take a pretty sunny view of circumstances' to think the PM's December prediction is achievable while Labour's Lord Adonis said it was a 'mistake' and it is not 'at all likely that we are going to be back to normal by Christmas'.John Phillips, acting general secretary of the GMB union, said Mr Johnson had 'once again shown a failure of leadership' by handing responsibility for the return of workers to businesses rather than taking charge of the issue himself.'Passing the responsibility of keeping the people safe to employers and local authorities is confusing and dangerous,' he said.'With fears of a second spike looming, bewildering advice, and a desperately underfunded health service – the Prime Minister's talk of returning to normality by Christmas just seems phoney.'TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady echoed a similar sentiment as she said: 'Returns to workplaces must happen in a phased and safe way. The Government is passing the buck on this big decision to employers.'And the UK's chief scientist Sir Patrick Vallance today warned that Britain could need another national lockdown this winter just hours after Mr Johnson announced his plans to try and get the country back to normal by the end of the year.In signs of a growing rift between the PM and his top advisers, both Sir Patrick and chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, said the coronavirus challenges in the UK will be 'very much greater' in the winter because the season 'benefits' the virus.The PM's plans also came under fire from scientists and medics who fear it is too soon for Number 10 to ease more restrictions because the virus is still 'rife' and people becoming complacent could risk a second wave.Sir Patrick and Prof Whitty were both notably absent from today's Downing Street press conference, despite the fact they have flanked the PM at briefings throughout the pandemic, in a move which will ignite speculation of a worsening split between Mr Johnson and his experts.Mr Johnson stopped short of ordering workers to return after Sir Patrick had warned yesterday there was 'absolutely no reason' to change the existing policy of people working from home where they are able to.The PM also announced today that audiences will be able to return to indoor theatre, music and performance events from August 1 if venues put in place social distancing measures.He said ministers will review all of the remaining 'outstanding restrictions' - including social distancing - in the coming months in order to allow a 'more significant return to normality from November at the earliest' and 'possibly in time for Christmas'.But he insisted all of the proposed changes would only go ahead if the spread of coronavirus continues to fall and that 'we will not hesitate at any stage to put on the brakes' if there is an increase in infection.He stressed the UK must be prepared for a potential second wave in the winter as he announced £3 billion of extra funding for the NHS, unveiled new 'lightning lockdown' powers to enable ministers and councils to pounce on local outbreaks and pledged to increase daily coronavirus testing capacity to 500,000 by the end of October.Mr Johnson's timetable for the further easing of coronavirus restrictions came as:
- Health Secretary Matt Hancock ordered Public Health England to review the way it counts deaths because of a 'statistical flaw' that means officials have 'over-exaggerating' the daily toll.
- It emerged PHE has been counting people as victims of coronavirus even if they die of another cause at another time having previously tested positive for Covid-19.
- A new study suggested Britain may already have developed herd immunity against coronavirus because many people have suffered from milder strains of similar types of infection in the past.
- Security Minister James Brokenshire said the UK is at least 95 per cent certain the Kremlin gave the green light for Russian cyber attacks designed to steak coronavirus vaccine research.
- But he insisted there was 'no evidence' that the raids had been successful as he said they are 'completely unacceptable'.
- Official data showed the rate of spread of coronavirus across the UK is at minus five per cent to minus one per cent while the R rate of reproduction remains between 0.7 and 0.9.
Boris Johnson's timetable for getting life in the UK back to normal
A Department of Health spokesperson said today: 'The Health Secretary has asked Public Health England to conduct an urgent review into the reporting of deaths statistics, aimed at providing greater clarity on the number of fatalities related to Covid-19 as we move past the peak of the virus.'
The way PHE counts victims on a daily basis works by it combing through records of people who have tested positive for Covid-19 in the past to see if they have died. If they have, their death is automatically added to the coronavirus count.
It means that if, for example, somebody tested positive in April but recovered and was then hit by a bus in July, they would still be counted as a Covid-19 victim.
Dr Loke pointed out that unless PHE changes its system, all 292,000 people who have tested positive so far will be added to the Covid-19 death toll when they eventually die.
The Department of Health, which uses PHE's data for its daily announcements, has so far counted 45,119 fatalities with 66 announced yesterday.
The 'statistical flaw' should not drastically affect the total number of deaths but means the ongoing death tolls appear worse than the reality.
The Office for National Statistics - which is not affected by the counting method - has confirmed at least 50,698 people have died in England and Wales up to July 3.
Public Health England admitted it is counting the deaths of anyone who tests positive for Covid-19, regardless of how long afterwards they died.
Dr Loke said: 'It seems that PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not.
'PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the Covid-19 test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community.
'Anyone who has tested Covid-19 positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE Covid-19 death figures... even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later.'
The pharmacologist, who published his findings in a blog post last night, said the bizarre way of recording deaths is why there are such wide variations in daily figures. On Monday July 6, for example, 16 deaths were recorded, while 152 were announced the next day on Tuesday the 7th.
The Department of Health has blamed low numbers on Sundays and Mondays on a 'weekend effect' which means paperwork doesn't get completed.
But academics are increasingly confused about why there are such wild variations, and why the number of deaths seems to remain so high.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock has called for an urgent review into the way deaths are being counted by Public Health EnglandAnd it appears to be simply that anyone who dies after being added to a register of people who have tested positive is classified as a victim.
It is currently impossible to know how many of the deaths announced by the Department of Health were not actually caused directly by Covid-19.
Dr Loke told MailOnline: 'This is a very serious issue for public confidence.
'When you go onto social media you will see hundreds of posts from rightly anxious people who are petrified at the seemingly relentless, unyielding daily death toll in England. The public are scared.
'The public are asking questions about why England is doing so badly, when actually the truth is that the healthcare professionals in NHS are doing a great job in ensuring thousands of Covid survivors. The statistics here are misleading the public.
'Because of this major flaw in the statistics, and the fact that tens of thousands of older people are being monitored, there is going to be a very very long tail of daily deaths.
'The death toll will go down exceedingly slowly. It's certainly not going to get to zero for months to come yet, because older people who have recovered from Covid-19 will unfortunately still succumb to other illnesses.'
Professor Carl Heneghan and Dr Jason Oke, Oxford University researchers who published Dr Loke's work on their website, said that officials also seem to be spreading out historical deaths and just adding them on to ones that are happening now.
The pair pointed out the death counts from NHS England, which are accurate around three days after the date in question, are too low to match counts from PHE.
According to the Office for National Statistics, hospital fatalities now make up around 60 per cent of all deaths that happen on any given day.
On June 30, NHS England recorded 27 fatalities. If this was 60 per cent of all deaths that happened on that day the total number would be 45.
But the Department of Health, using PHE's data, announced 115 more deaths on that day.
Dr Loke now suggests these massively inflated numbers are because PHE is counting people who died outside of hospital but didn't die of coronavirus at all.
He wrote: 'PHE data confirm that more than 125,000 patients have been admitted to NHS hospitals for Covid-19, the majority being successfully treated and discharged.
'There are now less than 1,900 patients in hospital. So, roughly 80,000 recovered patients in the community will continue being monitored by PHE for the daily death statistics.
'More and more people (who are mainly in the older age group) are being discharged to the community, but they clearly may die of other illnesses.'
Dr Loke said it would be a 'reasonable approach' to set a three-week limit on blaming someone's death on coronavirus unless they were in hospital.
Public Health England told MailOnline that the World Health Organization has not defined a time limit for counting a death as caused by Covid-19, and said it 'continues to keep this under review'.
It admitted that a coronavirus death is a death that happens to anyone who has previously tested positive, regardless of how long ago the test happened.
It said the 'vast majority' of Covid-19 deaths are correctly identified.
Dr Loke added: 'This statistical flaw arose because PHE chose a quick and easy technique.
'Their statistical method is reasonably accurate at the beginning of the pandemic, when there were not yet many people in the community who had survived Covid.
'However, PHE did not - and have not yet - realised that glaring inaccuracies arise when tens of thousands of frail older people are discharged from hospital, and these Covid survivors unfortunately die from other, non-Covid related causes.
'Like most things that are a quick fix, the monitoring system eventually churns out gibberish, and needs a thorough overhaul so that a lasting solution is implemented.'
Dr Susan Hopkins, Public Health England's incident director, said: 'Although it may seem straightforward, there is no WHO agreed method of counting deaths from Covid-19.
'In England, we count all those that have died who had a positive Covid-19 test at any point, to ensure our data is as complete as possible.
'We must remember that this is a new and emerging infection and there is increasing evidence of long term health problems for some of those affected. Whilst this knowledge is growing, now is the right time to review how deaths are calculated.'
Coronavirus R rate has crept above one again in London and is still above the dreaded number in the South West as SAGE claims outbreak is still shrinking by 5% a day in the UK
The coronavirus R rate has crept above one again in London and is still above the dreaded number in the South West — but SAGE has claimed Britain's outbreak is still shrinking by up to 5 per cent a day.
The Government's scientific advisory panel revealed the virus's reproduction rate — the average number of people each Covid-19 patient infects — is still between 0.7 and 0.9 as a whole for the UK, meaning it hasn't changed in two months.
But SAGE admitted the R could be as high as 1.1 in the South West of England, where Britons have been flocking for stay-cations to enjoy the coastline of Cornwall, Devon and Dorset, and in London, where pubs have been rammed with customers after reopening earlier this month. The rate is only definitely below one in the North East and Yorkshire.
For England as a whole, the R is slightly higher than the rest of the country, with the reproduction number hovering between 0.8 and 1. Keeping the rate below one is considered key because it means the outbreak is shrinking as not everyone who catches it passes it on.
Separate SAGE data today revealed the UK's current growth rate — how the number of new cases is changing day-by-day — is between minus five and minus one per cent.
It is more confirmation the crisis is still petering out and suggests the reopening of pubs, restaurants, hairdressers and beauty salons on July 4, dubbed 'Super Saturday', has not triggered a resurgence yet. But the figures show the UK's outbreak is now be shrinking at a slightly slower speed because the growth rate has crept up from last week's rate of minus 5 per cent to minus 2 per cent per day.
Scientists today said they were 'cautiously optimistic' about the data, which they say shows 'there is no indication the epidemic has gotten out of hand as a result of the easement' of lockdown. But they warned Brits 'must stay completely vigilant' because a lag in the statistics means it is at least two weeks behind and it could take until next week for any spike to become visible.
Other data released today from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the coronavirus outbreak in England isn't changing in size and 1,700 people are still catching the illness every day. And Britain today announced 114 more coronavirus deaths, taking the seven-day mean to 82.
It comes after Boris Johnson today urged all workers to return to offices in August as he set out his timetable for life in the UK to return to normal by Christmas. In a Downing Street press conference, he revealed restrictions on the use of public transport in England are being dropped immediately with trips on the train and bus to no longer be viewed as the option of last resort.



Reacting to the findings, Dr Daniel Lawson, a statistician at the University of Bristol, said: 'These data allow us to be cautiously optimistic. There is no indication that the epidemic has gotten out of hand as a result of the easements.
'However we must stay completely vigilant because there is a delay of at least two weeks before an increase in the reproductive rate of the virus is visible in the data.'
The growth rate reflects how quickly the number of infections is changing day by day and, as the number of infections decreases, it is a way of keeping track of the virus.
If it is greater than zero, and therefore positive, then the disease will grow, and if the growth rate is less than zero, then the disease will shrink.
However, there is some regional variation between the figures. In the South West of England, the growth rate changed from minus 6 per cent to plus 1 per cent, to minus 6 per cent to plus two. The R number is 0.7-1.1.
In London, the growth rate is between minus 3 per cent and plus 2 per cent, compared to between minus 5 per cent and plus 1 per cent last week. The capital has an R value of 0.8-1.1.
The Midlands has a growth rate of minus 5 per cent to minus 1 per cent per day, compared to minus 6 per cent to minus 2 per cent last week. Its R value is 0.7-1.0.
In the North East and Yorkshire, the growth rate is unchanged at minus 5 per cent to minus 1 per cent. Its R number is 0.7-0.9.
The North West has a growth rate of minus 6 per cent to minus 1 per cent, a change from minus 5 per cent to minus 1 per cent, and an R value of 0.7-1.0.
The growth rate in the South East is unchanged at minus 4 per cent to zero, with an R value of 0.8-1.0. In the South West, the growth rate changed from between minus 6 per cent and plus 1 per cent, to between minus 6 per cent and plus 2 per cent.
The region also sees the R value creeping above one, with a range of 0.7-1.1.
Across England, the growth rate is between minus 4 per cent and zero, compared with between minus 4 per cent to minus 1 per cent next week.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson today set out the next stage in his plan to return life to normal in the UK
The R value across England is 0.8-1.0 and has been that way since jumping from 0.8 to 0.9 last week.
An R of 1 means the coronavirus spreads one-to-one and the outbreak is neither growing nor shrinking. Higher, and it will get larger as more people get infected; lower, and the outbreak will shrink and eventually fade away.
At the start of Britain's outbreak it was thought to be around 4 and tens of thousands of people were infected, meaning the number of cases spiralled out of control.
The R has now been between 0.7 and 0.9 since the end of May, according to the Government, but experts say it will start to fluctuate more as the number of cases gets lower.
The fewer cases there are, the greater the chance that one or two 'super-spreading' events will seriously impact the R rate estimate, which are at least three weeks behind.
Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government's chief scientific adviser, explained last month that the UK is approaching the point where the R will no longer be an accurate measure for this reason.
The Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M) – a subgroup of SAGE – use data on the number of Covid-19 deaths and positive tests to work out how quickly outbreaks are growing. Monitoring confirmed cases, hospitalisations and deaths is a more accurate way to identify local hotspots, they say.
As the number of people with the virus falls, the data measuring them will be more volatile and affected by small outliers or unusual events. A large margin of error could mean one 'super-spreading' event, when one person infects a lot of others, could send the R rate for one area soaring, mathematicians warn.
R rates also fluctuate depending on mobility, and are likely to shoot up when lockdown eases because infected patients will come into contact with more people, on average - especially if they show none of the tell-tale symptoms. But a temporarily high R rate is not necessarily cause for concern if the actual number of infections stays low.

Two women walk through Clapham Common in London today, without wearing face masks. It comes as SAGE has warned the R rate could be above one in the South West of England and London

Dr Loke's analysis shows that 'all settings' deaths (red bar) remain very high in England even as hospital deaths (blue bar) - which the Office for National Statistics says should make up two thirds of the total - have plummeted

SAGE admitted the R could be as high as 1.1 in the South West of England, where Britons have been flocking for stay-cations to enjoy the coastline of Cornwall, Devon and Dorset (pictured, people head to the beach in Bournemouth, Dorset), and in London, where pubs have been rammed with customers after reopening earlier this month
For example, if there are 1,000 people infected with the virus and they all infect 0.8 people each on average, or 800 in total, the R will be 0.8.
But if 995 of them infect 0.8 people each, on average, but five of them don't realise they are ill and infect 10 people each, there are now a total of 846 extra patients. This means the R rate is 0.846 - a marginal increase.
However, if there are only 10 people with the virus in an area, with nine of them at an R of 0.8, and one of them is a super-spreader and infects 10 others, there are 17 patients from those 10 and the R rate has risen to 1.72.
It comes as Boris Johnson today announced he is aiming for life in the UK to return to something close to normal by Christmas as he said workers will be encouraged to stop working from home from August.
The Prime Minister today used a Downing Street press conference to set out his timetable for the further easing of lockdown measures.
He said restrictions on the use of public transport in England are being dropped from today with trips on the train and bus to no longer be viewed as the option of last resort.
He said the Government will publish new guidance applying from August on the crunch issue of working from home in the hope that more employees will physically return to their desks to give the economy a much needed boost.
He made that pledge despite Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government's chief scientific adviser, warning yesterday that there was 'absolutely no reason' to change the policy.
Meanwhile, the Prime Minister said the Government is targeting the reopening of stadiums in the autumn with audiences potentially returning to football matches and outdoor gigs in October.
Crucially, the PM also said the Government is hoping to review all the remaining 'outstanding restrictions' in the coming months in order to allow a 'more significant return to normality from November' and 'possibly in time for Christmas'.
However, Mr Johnson insisted that all of the proposed changes would only go ahead if the spread of coronavirus continues to fall and that 'we will not hesitate at any stage to put on the brakes' if there is an increase in infections.
He stressed the UK must be prepared for a second wave in the winter as he announced £3 billion of extra funding for the NHS and vowed new powers to enable ministers and councils to impose strict local lockdowns.
He also pledged to increase the UK's daily coronavirus testing capacity to 500,000 a day by the end of October with the NHS Test and Trace programme tasked with playing a key role in stopping the spread of the disease.
It comes as figures from the Office for National Statistics today suggested the coronavirus outbreak in England isn't changing in size and 1,700 people are still catching the illness every day.
Estimates based on population testing suggest one in every 2,300 people is now carrying Covid-19 - a total of 24,000 people or 0.04 per cent of the population. This is a slight rise from the 0.03 per cent (14,000) estimated last week but both are within a possible range, showing any change is not significant.
The number of people catching the virus each day - 1,700 - has not changed in a week, however, and the ONS said the outbreak has 'levelled off'.
Separate estimates of cases by King's College London and Public Health England say between 2,100 and 3,300 people are getting infected in England every day - higher than that found by the ONS.
ONS data is considered to be some of the most accurate available - this week's update was based on the results of 112,776 swab tests taken over six weeks, of which 39 were positive.
The data suggests that lifting the rest of the lockdown rules on 'Super Saturday', July 4, does not yet seem to have triggered a rise in coronavirus cases in England - backdated data will only just be starting to take that effect into account, however, meaning the next few weeks will be critical.
Separate antibody testing by the ONS - looking at people's blood for signs of past infection - suggests that 2.8million people, or 6.3 per cent of people in England, have had Covid-19 already.
Separate ONS data today revealed Covid-19 was still the third most common cause of death in England and Wales in June, even though the darkest days of crisis are over.
One in 14 deaths were caused by the coronavirus in June - the same month Number 10 began to relax strict lockdown measures.
The disease was written on 2,525 death certificates, meaning 50,335 confirmed or suspected Covid-19 deaths have been recorded over the course of the pandemic.
But coronavirus deaths in June were significantly lower than they were in May, when the life-threatening infection accounted for a fifth of all fatalities.
And it's the first time since March that the coronavirus was not the leading cause of death, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) data released today.
Dementia and Alzheimer's took the lead for the most frequent underlying cause of death in June, accounting for 10 per cent of fatalities.
Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices
Enough news articles Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices this time, hopefully can benefit for you all. Well, see you in other article postings.
Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices
You are now reading the article Boris Johnson slammed over his 'over optimistic' aim of getting life back to normal by Christmas as unions accuse the Prime Minister of 'passing the buck' by telling businesses to decide when workers should return to offices with the link address https://randomfindtruth.blogspot.com/2020/07/boris-johnson-slammed-over-his-over.html