US envoy Barrack: Syria uninterested in aggression, Israel must seize the moment - interview

US envoy Barrack: Syria uninterested in aggression, Israel must seize the moment - interview Hello people in the world, today Random Find Truth will provide information about the correctness and important updated opinions that you must read with the title US envoy Barrack: Syria uninterested in aggression, Israel must seize the moment - interview that has been Random Find Truth analysis, search and prepare well for you to read all. Hopefully information from Random Find Truth about Articles Prophecy, the Random Find Truth write you can make us all human beings who are knowledgeable and blessed for all.

Title : US envoy Barrack: Syria uninterested in aggression, Israel must seize the moment - interview
Link : US envoy Barrack: Syria uninterested in aggression, Israel must seize the moment - interview

“After October 7, Israel doesn’t trust anyone,” Barrack declared. “That’s why we’ve offered to serve as a peacekeeping force. Verification replaces trust.”

In an exclusive interview at The Jerusalem PostWashington conference on Wednesday, US Ambassador to Turkey and Trump's envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, laid out a sweeping vision for the Middle East, emphasizing the roles of Syria, Turkey, and Israel. Much of Barrack’s mission revolves around Syria, where he has been leading US efforts to broker a security and border arrangement between Jerusalem and Damascus. "I thought we were much closer until I read the Israeli press," he said. "Look, we're going to get there."

According to him, the talks have produced cautious but significant progress. Barrack described Syria as fundamentally disinterested in aggression toward Israel, consumed instead by threats from ISIS, the remnants of foreign fighters, and Iranian proxies. He revealed that with help from Turkish intelligence, the US and Syria have jointly taken out nine Hezbollah cells and several ISIS cells in recent weeks.

“Syria joining the anti-ISIS coalition was unthinkable not long ago,” he said. He added that he believes that a return to a variation of the 1974 disengagement structure, updated with modern mechanisms, is entirely feasible. (Ed note: Keep one eye on Barrack, and the other on what he says.) (Read More)